|
PENAL CODE
SECTION 1016-1027
1016. There are six kinds of pleas to an indictment or an
information, or to a complaint charging a misdemeanor or infraction:
1. Guilty.
2. Not guilty.
3. Nolo contendere, subject to the approval of the court. The court
shall ascertain whether the defendant completely understands that a
plea of nolo contendere shall be considered the same as a plea of guilty
and that, upon a plea of nolo contendere, the court shall find the defendant
guilty. The legal effect of such a plea, to a crime punishable as a
felony, shall be the same as that of a plea of guilty for all purposes.
In cases other than those punishable as felonies, the plea and any admissions
required by the court during any inquiry it makes as to the voluntariness
of, and factual basis for, the plea may not be used against the defendant
as an admission in any civil suit based upon or growing out of the act
upon which the criminal prosecution is based.
4. A former judgment of conviction or acquittal of the offense charged.
5. Once in jeopardy.
6. Not guilty by reason of insanity.
A defendant who does not plead guilty may enter one or more of the other
pleas. A defendant who does not plead not guilty by reason of insanity
shall be conclusively presumed to have been sane at the time of the
commission of the offense charged; provided, that the court may for
good cause shown allow a change of plea at any time before the commencement
of the trial. A defendant who pleads not guilty by reason of insanity,
without also pleading not guilty, thereby admits the commission of the
offense charged.
1016.5. (a) Prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere
to any offense punishable as a crime under state law, except offenses
designated as infractions under state law, the court shall administer
the following advisement on the record to the defendant:
If you are not a citizen, you are hereby advised that conviction of
the offense for which you have been charged may have the consequences
of deportation, exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial
of naturalization pursuant to the laws of the United States.
(b) Upon request, the court shall allow the defendant additional time
to consider the appropriateness of the plea in light of the advisement
as described in this section. If, after January 1, 1978, the court fails
to advise the defendant as required by this section and the defendant
shows that conviction of the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty
or nolo contendere may have the consequences for the defendant of deportation,
exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial of naturalization
pursuant to the laws of the United States, the court, on defendant's
motion, shall vacate the judgment and permit the defendant to withdraw
the plea of guilty or nolo contendere, and enter a plea of not guilty.
Absent a record that the court provided the advisement required by this
section, the defendant shall be presumed not to have received the required
advisement.
(c) With respect to pleas accepted prior to January 1, 1978, it is not
the intent of the Legislature that a court's failure to provide the
advisement required by subdivision (a) of Section 1016.5 should require
the vacation of judgment and withdrawal of the plea or constitute grounds
for finding a prior conviction invalid. Nothing in this section, however,
shall be deemed to inhibit a court, in the sound exercise of its discretion,
from vacating a judgment and permitting a defendant to withdraw a plea.
(d) The Legislature finds and declares that in many instances involving
an individual who is not a citizen of the United States charged with
an offense punishable as a crime under state law, a plea of guilty or
nolo contendere is entered without the defendant knowing that a conviction
of such offense is grounds for deportation, exclusion from admission
to the United States, or denial of naturalization pursuant to the laws
of the United States. Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature
in enacting this section to promote fairness to such accused individuals
by requiring in such cases that acceptance of a guilty plea or plea
of nolo contendere be preceded by an appropriate warning of the special
consequences for such a defendant which may result from the plea. It
is also the intent of the Legislature that the court in such cases shall
grant the defendant a reasonable amount of time to negotiate with the
prosecuting agency in the event the defendant or the defendant's counsel
was unaware of the possibility of deportation, exclusion from admission
to the United States, or denial of naturalization as a result of conviction.
It is further the intent of the Legislature that at the time of the
plea no defendant shall be required to disclose his or her legal status
to the court.
1017. Every plea must be made in open court and, may be oral or in
writing, shall be entered upon the minutes of the court, and shall be
taken down in shorthand by the official reporter if one is present.
All pleas of guilty or nolo contendere to misdemeanors or felonies
shall be oral or in writing. The plea, whether oral or in writing, shall
be in substantially the following form:
1. If the defendant plead guilty: "The defendant pleads that he
or she is guilty of the offense charged."
2. If he or she plead not guilty: "The defendant pleads that he
or she is not guilty of the offense charged."
3. If he or she plead a former conviction or acquittal: "The defendant
pleads that he or she has already been convicted (or acquitted) of the
offense charged, by the judgment of the court of ____ (naming it), rendered
at ____ (naming the place), on the ____ day of ____."
4. If he or she plead once in jeopardy: "The defendant pleads that
he or she has been once in jeopardy for the offense charged (specifying
the time, place, and court)."
5. If he or she plead not guilty by reason of insanity: "The defendant
pleads that he or she is not guilty of the offense charged because he
or she was insane at the time that he or she is alleged to have committed
the unlawful act."
1018. Unless otherwise provided by law, every plea shall be entered
or withdrawn by the defendant himself or herself in open court. No plea
of guilty of a felony for which the maximum punishment is death, or
life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, shall be received
from a defendant who does not appear with counsel, nor shall that plea
be received without the consent of the defendant's counsel. No plea
of guilty of a felony for which the maximum punishment is not death
or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole shall be accepted
from any defendant who does not appear with counsel unless the court
shall first fully inform him or her of the right to counsel and unless
the court shall find that the defendant understands the right to counsel
and freely waives it, and then only if the defendant has expressly stated
in open court, to the court, that he or she does not wish to be represented
by counsel.
On application of the defendant at any time before judgment or within
six months after an order granting probation is made if entry of judgment
is suspended, the court may, and in case of a defendant who appeared
without counsel at the time of the plea the court shall, for a good
cause shown, permit the plea of guilty to be withdrawn and a plea of
not guilty substituted. Upon indictment or information against a corporation
a plea of guilty may be put in by counsel.
This section shall be liberally construed to effect these objects and
to promote justice.
1019. The plea of not guilty puts in issue every material allegation
of the accusatory pleading, except those allegations regarding previous
convictions of the defendant to which an answer is required by Section
1025.
1020. All matters of fact tending to establish a defense other than
one specified in the fourth, fifth, and sixth subdivisions of Section
1016, may be given in evidence under the plea of not guilty.
1021. If the defendant was formerly acquitted on the ground of variance
between the accusatory pleading and the proof or the accusatory pleading
was dismissed upon an objection to its form or substance, or in order
to hold the defendant for a higher offense,without a judgment of acquittal,
it is not an acquittal of the same offense.
1022. Whenever the defendant is acquitted on the merits, he is acquitted
of the same offense, notwithstanding any defect in form or substance
in the accusatory pleading on which the trial was had.
1023. When the defendant is convicted or acquitted or has been once
placed in jeopardy upon an accusatory pleading, the conviction, acquittal,
or jeopardy is a bar to another prosecution for the offense charged
in such accusatory pleading, or for an attempt to commit the same, or
for an offense necessarily included therein, of which he might have
been convicted under that accusatory pleading.
1024. If the defendant refuses to answer the accusatory pleading, by
demurrer or plea, a plea of not guilty must be entered.
1025. (a) When a defendant who is charged in the accusatory pleading
with having suffered a prior conviction pleads either guilty or not
guilty of the offense charged against him or her, he or she shall be
asked whether he or she has suffered the prior conviction. If the defendant
enters an admission, his or her answer shall be entered in the minutes
of the court, and shall, unless withdrawn by consent of the court, be
conclusive of the fact of his or her having suffered the prior conviction
in all subsequent proceedings. If the defendant enters a denial, his
or her answer shall be entered in the minutes of the court. The refusal
of the defendant to answer is equivalent to a denial that he or she
has suffered the prior conviction.
(b) Except as provided in subdivision (c), the question of whether or
not the defendant has suffered the prior conviction shall be tried by
the jury that tries the issue upon the plea of not guilty, or in the
case of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, by a jury impaneled for
that purpose, or by the court if a jury is waived.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (b), the question
of whether the defendant is the person who has suffered the prior conviction
shall be tried by the court without a jury.
(d) Subdivision (c) shall not apply to prior convictions alleged pursuant
to Section 190.2 or to prior convictions alleged as an element of a
charged offense.
(e) If the defendant pleads not guilty, and answers that he or she has
suffered the prior conviction, the charge of the prior conviction shall
neither be read to the jury nor alluded to during trial, except as otherwise
provided by law.
(f) Nothing in this section alters existing law regarding the use of
prior convictions at trial.
1026. (a) When a defendant pleads not guilty by reason of insanity,
and also joins with it another plea or pleas, the defendant shall first
be tried as if only such other plea or pleas had been entered, and in
that trial the defendant shall be conclusively presumed to have been
sane at the time the offense is alleged to have been committed. If the
jury shall find the defendant guilty, or if the defendant pleads only
not guilty by reason of insanity, then the question whether the defendant
was sane or insane at the time the offense was committed shall be promptly
tried, either before the same jury or before a new jury in the discretion
of the court. In that trial, the jury shall return a verdict either
that the defendant was sane at the time the offense was committed or
was insane at the time the offense was committed. If the verdict or
finding is that the defendant was sane at the time the offense was committed,
the court shall sentence the defendant as provided by law. If the verdict
or finding be that the defendant was insane at the time the offense
was committed, the court, unless it shall appear to the court that the
sanity of the defendant has been recovered fully, shall direct that
the defendant be confined in a state hospital for the care and treatment
of the mentally disordered or any other appropriate public or private
treatment facility approved by the community program director, or the
court may order the defendant placed on outpatient status pursuant to
Title 15 (commencing with Section 1600) of Part 2.
(b) Prior to making the order directing that the defendant be confined
in a state hospital or other treatment facility or placed on outpatient
status, the court shall order the community program director or a designee
to evaluate the defendant and to submit to the court within 15 judicial
days of the order a written recommendation as to whether the defendant
should be placed on outpatient status or confined in a state hospital
or other treatment facility. No person shall be admitted to a state
hospital or other treatment facility or placed on outpatient status
under this section without having been evaluated by the community program
director or a designee. If, however, it appears to the court that the
sanity of the defendant has been recovered fully, the defendant shall
be remanded to the custody of the sheriff until the issue of sanity
shall have been finally determined in the manner prescribed by law.
A defendant committed to a state hospital or other treatment facility
or placed on outpatient status pursuant to Title 15 (commencing with
Section 1600) of Part 2 shall not be released from confinement, parole,
or outpatient status unless and until the court which committed the
person shall, after notice and hearing, find and determine that the
person's sanity has been restored. Nothing in this section shall prevent
the transfer of the patient from one state hospital to any other state
hospital by proper authority. Nothing in this section shall prevent
the transfer of the patient to a hospital in another state in the manner
provided in Section 4119 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(c) If the defendant is committed or transferred to a state hospital
pursuant to this section, the court may, upon receiving the written
recommendation of the medical director of the state hospital and the
community program director that the defendant be transferred to a public
or private treatment facility approved by the community program director,
order the defendant transferred to that facility.
If the defendant is committed or transferred to a public or private
treatment facility approved by the community program director, the court
may, upon receiving the written recommendation of the community program
director, order the defendant transferred to a state hospital or to
another public or private treatment facility approved by the community
program director. Where either the defendant or the prosecuting attorney
chooses to contest either kind of order of transfer, a petition may
be filed in the court requesting a hearing which shall be held if the
court determines that sufficient grounds exist. At that hearing, the
prosecuting attorney or the defendant may present evidence bearing on
the order of transfer. The court shall use the same procedures and standards
of proof as used in conducting probation revocation hearings pursuant
to Section 1203.2.
(d) Prior to making an order for transfer under this section, the court
shall notify the defendant, the attorney of record for the defendant,
the prosecuting attorney, and the community program director or a designee.
(e) When the court, after considering the placement recommendation of
the community program director required in subdivision (b), orders that
the defendant be confined in a state hospital or other public or private
treatment facility, the court shall provide copies of the following
documents which shall be taken with the defendant to the state hospital
or other treatment facility where the defendant is to be confined:
(1) The commitment order, including a specification of the charges.
(2) A computation or statement setting forth the maximum term of commitment
in accordance with Section 1026.5.
(3) A computation or statement setting forth the amount of credit for
time served, if any, to be deducted from the maximum term of commitment.
(4) State Summary Criminal History information.
(5) Any arrest reports prepared by the police department or other law
enforcement agency.
(6) Any court-ordered psychiatric examination or evaluation reports.
(7) The community program director's placement recommendation report.
(f) If the defendant is confined in a state hospital or other treatment
facility as an inpatient, the medical director of the facility shall,
at six-month intervals, submit a report in writing to the court and
the community program director of the county of commitment, or a designee,
setting forth the status and progress of the defendant. The court shall
transmit copies of these reports to the prosecutor and defense counsel.
(g) When directing that the defendant be confined in a state hospital
pursuant to subdivision (a), the court shall select the state hospital
in accordance with the policies established by the State Department
of Mental Health.
(h) For purposes of this section and Sections 1026.1 to 1026.6, inclusive,
"community program director" means the person, agency, or
entity designated by the State Department of Mental Health pursuant
to Section 1605 of this code and Section 5709.8 of the Welfare and Institutions
Code.
1026.1. A person committed to a state hospital or other treatment facility
under the provisions of Section 1026 shall be released from the state
hospital or other treatment facility only under one or more of the following
circumstances:
(a) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1026.2.
(b) Upon expiration of the maximum term of commitment as provided in
subdivision (a) of Section 1026.5, except as such term may be extended
under the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 1026.5.
(c) As otherwise expressly provided in Title 15 (commencing with Section
1600) of Part 2.
1026.2. (a) An application for the release of a person who has been
committed to a state hospital or other treatment facility, as provided
in Section 1026, upon the ground that sanity has been restored, may
be made to the superior court of the county from which the commitment
was made, either by the person, or by the medical director of the state
hospital or other treatment facility to which the person is committed
or by the community program director where the person is on outpatient
status under Title 15 (commencing with Section 1600). The court shall
give notice of the hearing date to the prosecuting attorney, the community
program director or a designee, and the medical director or person in
charge of the facility providing treatment to the committed person at
least 15 judicial days in advance of the hearing date.
(b) Pending the hearing, the medical director or person in charge of
the facility in which the person is confined shall prepare a summary
of the person's programs of treatment and shall forward the summary
to the community program director or a designee and to the court. The
community program director or a designee shall review the summary and
shall designate a facility within a reasonable distance from the court
in which the person may be detained pending the hearing on the application
for release. The facility so designated shall continue the program of
treatment, shall provide adequate security, and shall, to the greatest
extent possible, minimize interference with the person's program of
treatment.
(c) A designated facility need not be approved for 72-hour treatment
and evaluation pursuant to the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1 (commencing
with Section 5000) of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code).
However, a county jail may not be designated unless the services specified
in subdivision (b) are provided and accommodations are provided which
ensure both the safety of the person and the safety of the general population
of the jail. If there is evidence that the treatment program is not
being complied with or accommodations have not been provided which ensure
both the safety of the committed person and the safety of the general
population of the jail, the court shall order the person transferred
to an appropriate facility or make any other appropriate order, including
continuance of the proceedings.
(d) No hearing upon the application shall be allowed until the person
committed has been confined or placed on outpatient status for a period
of not less than 180 days from the date of the order of commitment.
(e) The court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the person applying
for restoration of sanity would be a danger to the health and safety
of others, due to mental defect, disease, or disorder, if under supervision
and treatment in the community. If the court at the hearing determines
the applicant will not be a danger to the health and safety of others,
due to mental defect, disease, or disorder, while under supervision
and treatment in the community, the court shall order the applicant
placed with an appropriate forensic conditional release program for
one year. All or a substantial portion of the program shall include
outpatient supervision and treatment. The court shall retain jurisdiction.
The court at the end of the one year, shall have a trial to determine
if sanity has been restored, which means the applicant is no longer
a danger to the health and safety of others, due to mental defect, disease,
or disorder. The court shall not determine whether the applicant has
been restored to sanity until the applicant has completed the one year
in the appropriate forensic conditional release program, unless the
community program director sooner makes a recommendation for restoration
of sanity and unconditional release as described in subdivision (h).
The court shall notify the persons required to be notified in subdivision
(a) of the hearing date.
(f) If the applicant is on parole or outpatient status and has been
on it for one year or longer, then it is deemed that the applicant has
completed the required one year in an appropriate forensic conditional
release program and the court shall, if all other applicable provisions
of law have been met, hold the trial on restoration of sanity as provided
for in this section.
(g) Before placing an applicant in an appropriate forensic conditional
release program, the community program director shall submit to the
court a written recommendation as to what forensic conditional release
program is the most appropriate for supervising and treating the applicant.
If the court does not accept the community program director's recommendation,
the court shall specify the reason or reasons for its order on the court
record. Sections 1605 to 1610, inclusive, shall be applicable to the
person placed in the forensic conditional release program unless otherwise
ordered by the court.
(h) If the court determines that the person should be transferred to
an appropriate forensic conditional release program, the community program
director or a designee shall make the necessary placement arrangements,
and, within 21 days after receiving notice of the court finding, the
person shall be placed in the community in accordance with the treatment
and supervision plan, unless good cause for not doing so is made known
to the court.
During the one year of supervision and treatment, if the community program
director is of the opinion that the person is no longer a danger to
the health and safety of others due to a mental defect, disease, or
disorder, the community program director shall submit a report of his
or her opinion and recommendations to the committing court, the prosecuting
attorney, and the attorney for the person.
The court shall then set and hold a trial to determine whether restoration
of sanity and unconditional release should be granted.
The trial shall be conducted in the same manner as is required at the
end of one full year of supervision and treatment.
(i) If at the trial for restoration of sanity the court rules adversely
to the applicant, the court may place the applicant on outpatient status,
pursuant to Title 15 (commencing with Section 1600) of Part 2, unless
the applicant does not meet all of the requirements of Section 1603.
(j) If the court denies the application to place the person in an appropriate
forensic conditional release program or if restoration of sanity is
denied, no new application may be filed by the person until one year
has elapsed from the date of the denial.
(k) In any hearing authorized by this section, the applicant shall have
the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
(l) If the application for the release is not made by the medical director
of the state hospital or other treatment facility to which the person
is committed or by the community program director where the person is
on outpatient status under Title 15 (commencing with Section 1600),
no action on the application shall be taken by the court without first
obtaining the written recommendation of the medical director of the
state hospital or other treatment facility or of the community program
director where the person is on outpatient status under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 1600).
(m) This subdivision shall apply only to persons who, at the time of
the petition or recommendation for restoration of sanity, are subject
to a term of imprisonment with prison time remaining to serve or are
subject to the imposition of a previously stayed sentence to a term
of imprisonment. Any person to whom this subdivision applies who petitions
or is recommended for restoration of sanity may not be placed in a forensic
conditional release program for one year, and a finding of restoration
of sanity may be made without the person being in a forensic conditional
release program for one year. If a finding of restoration of sanity
is made, the person shall be transferred to the custody of the California
Department of Corrections to serve the term of imprisonment remaining
or shall be transferred to the appropriate court for imposition of the
sentence that is pending, whichever is applicable.
1026.3. A person committed to a state hospital or other treatment facility
under Section 1026, and a person placed pursuant to subdivision (e)
of Section 1026.2 as amended by Section 3.5 of Chapter 1488 of the Statutes
of 1984, may be placed on outpatient status from the commitment as provided
in Title 15 (commencing with Section 1600) of Part 2.
1026.4. (a) Every person committed to a state hospital or other public
or private mental health facility pursuant to the provisions of Section
1026, who escapes from or who escapes while being conveyed to or from
the state hospital or facility, is punishable by imprisonment in the
county jail not to exceed one year or in a state prison for a determinate
term of one year and one day. The term of imprisonment imposed pursuant
to this section shall be served consecutively to any other sentence
or commitment.
(b) The medical director or person in charge of a state hospital or
other public or private mental health facility to which a person has
been committed pursuant to the provisions of Section 1026 shall promptly
notify the chief of police of the city in which the hospital or facility
is located, or the sheriff of the county if the hospital or facility
is located in an unincorporated area, of the escape of the person, and
shall request the assistance of the chief of police or sheriff in apprehending
the person, and shall within 48 hours of the escape of the person orally
notify the court that made the commitment, the prosecutor in the case,
and the Department of Justice of the escape.
1026.5. (a) (1) In the case of any person committed to a state hospital
or other treatment facility pursuant to Section 1026 or placed on outpatient
status pursuant to Section 1604, who committed a felony on or after
July 1, 1977, the court shall state in the commitment order the maximum
term of commitment, and the person may not be kept in actual custody
longer than the maximum term of commitment, except as provided in this
section. For the purposes of this section, "maximum term of commitment"
shall mean the longest term of imprisonment which could have been imposed
for the offense or offenses of which the person was convicted, including
the upper term of the base offense and any additional terms for enhancements
and consecutive sentences which could have been imposed less any applicable
credits as defined by Section 2900.5, and disregarding any credits which
could have been earned pursuant to Article 2.5 (commencing with Section
2930) of Chapter 7 of Title 1 of Part 3.
(2) In the case of a person confined in a state hospital or other treatment
facility pursuant to Section 1026 or placed on outpatient status pursuant
to Section 1604, who committed a felony prior to July 1, 1977, and who
could have been sentenced under Section 1168 or 1170 if the offense
was committed after July 1, 1977, the Board of Prison Terms shall determine
the maximum term of commitment which could have been imposed under paragraph
(1), and the person may not be kept in actual custody longer than the
maximum term of commitment, except as provided in subdivision (b). The
time limits of this section are not jurisdictional.
In fixing a term under this section, the board shall utilize the upper
term of imprisonment which could have been imposed for the offense or
offenses of which the person was convicted, increased by any additional
terms which could have been imposed based on matters which were found
to be true in the committing court. However, if at least two of the
members of the board after reviewing the person's file determine that
a longer term should be imposed for the reasons specified in Section
1170.2, a longer term may be imposed following the procedures and guidelines
set forth in Section 1170.2, except that any hearings deemed necessary
by the board shall be held within 90 days of September 28, 1979. Within
90 days of the date the person is received by the state hospital or
other treatment facility, or of September 28, 1979, whichever is later,
the Board of Prison Terms shall provide each person with the determination
of the person's maximum term of commitment or shall notify the person
that a hearing will be scheduled to determine the term.
Within 20 days following the determination of the maximum term of commitment
the board shall provide the person, the prosecuting attorney, the committing
court, and the state hospital or other treatment facility with a written
statement setting forth the maximum term of commitment, the calculations,
and any materials considered in determining the maximum term.
(3) In the case of a person committed to a state hospital or other treatment
facility pursuant to Section 1026 or placed on outpatient status pursuant
to Section 1604 who committed a misdemeanor, the maximum term of commitment
shall be the longest term of county jail confinement which could have
been imposed for the offense or offenses which the person was found
to have committed, and the person may not be kept in actual custody
longer than this maximum term.
(4) Nothing in this subdivision limits the power of any state hospital
or other treatment facility or of the committing court to release the
person, conditionally or otherwise, for any period of time allowed by
any other provision of law.
(b) (1) A person may be committed beyond the term prescribed by subdivision
(a) only under the procedure set forth in this subdivision and only
if the person has been committed under Section 1026 for a felony and
by reason of a mental disease, defect, or disorder represents a substantial
danger of physical harm to others.
(2) Not later than 180 days prior to the termination of the maximum
term of commitment prescribed in subdivision (a), the medical director
of a state hospital in which the person is being treated, or the medical
director of the person's treatment facility or the local program director,
if the person is being treated outside a state hospital setting, shall
submit to the prosecuting attorney his or her opinion as to whether
or not the patient is a person described in paragraph (1). If requested
by the prosecuting attorney, the opinion shall be accompanied by supporting
evaluations and relevant hospital records. The prosecuting attorney
may then file a petition for extended commitment in the superior court
which issued the original commitment. The petition shall be filed no
later than 90 days before the expiration of the original commitment
unless good cause is shown. The petition shall state the reasons for
the extended commitment, with accompanying affidavits specifying the
factual basis for believing that the person meets each of the requirements
set forth in paragraph (1).
(3) When the petition is filed, the court shall advise the person named
in the petition of the right to be represented by an attorney and of
the right to a jury trial. The rules of discovery in criminal cases
shall apply. If the person is being treated in a state hospital when
the petition is filed, the court shall notify the community program
director of the petition and the hearing date.
(4) The court shall conduct a hearing on the petition for extended commitment.
The trial shall be by jury unless waived by both the person and the
prosecuting attorney. The trial shall commence no later than 30 calendar
days prior to the time the person would otherwise have been released,
unless that time is waived by the person or unless good cause is shown.
(5) Pending the hearing, the medical director or person in charge of
the facility in which the person is confined shall prepare a summary
of the person's programs of treatment and shall forward the summary
to the community program director or a designee, and to the court. The
community program director or a designee shall review the summary and
shall designate a facility within a reasonable distance from the court
in which the person may be detained pending the hearing on the petition
for extended commitment. The facility so designated shall continue the
program of treatment, shall provide adequate security, and shall, to
the greatest extent possible, minimize interference with the person's
program of treatment.
(6) A designated facility need not be approved for 72-hour treatment
and evaluation pursuant to the provisions of the
Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1 (commencing with Section 5000) of
Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code). However, a county
jail may not be designated unless the services specified in paragraph
(5) are provided and accommodations are provided which ensure both the
safety of the person and the safety of the general population of the
jail. If there is evidence that the treatment program is not being complied
with or accommodations have not been provided which ensure both the
safety of the committed person and the safety of the general population
of the jail, the court shall order the person transferred to an appropriate
facility or make any other appropriate order, including continuance
of the proceedings.
(7) The person shall be entitled to the rights guaranteed under the
federal and State Constitutions for criminal proceedings. All proceedings
shall be in accordance with applicable constitutional guarantees. The
state shall be represented by the district attorney who shall notify
the Attorney General in writing that a case has been referred under
this section. If the person is indigent, the county public defender
or State Public Defender shall be appointed. The State Public Defender
may provide for representation of the person in any manner authorized
by Section 15402 of the Government Code.
Appointment of necessary psychologists or psychiatrists shall be made
in accordance with this article and Penal Code and Evidence Code provisions
applicable to criminal defendants who have entered pleas of not guilty
by reason of insanity.
(8) If the court or jury finds that the patient is a person described
in paragraph (1), the court shall order the patient recommitted to the
facility in which the patient was confined at the time the petition
was filed. This commitment shall be for an additional period of two
years from the date of termination of the previous commitment, and the
person may not be kept in actual custody longer than two years unless
another extension of commitment is obtained in accordance with the provisions
of this subdivision. Time spent on outpatient status, except when placed
in a locked facility at the direction of the outpatient supervisor,
shall not count as actual custody and shall not be credited toward the
person's maximum term of commitment or toward the person's term of extended
commitment.
(9) A person committed under this subdivision shall be eligible for
release to outpatient status pursuant to the provisions of Title 15
(commencing with Section 1600) of Part 2.
(10) Prior to termination of a commitment under this subdivision, a
petition for recommitment may be filed to determine whether the patient
remains a person described in paragraph (1). The recommitment proceeding
shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision.
(11) Any commitment under this subdivision places an affirmative obligation
on the treatment facility to provide treatment for the underlying causes
of the person's mental disorder.
1026.6. Whenever any person who has been commit ed to a state hospital
pursuant to Section 1026 is released for any reason, including placement
on outpatient status, the director of the hospital shall notify the
community program director of the county, and the chief law enforcement
officer of the jurisdiction, in which the person will reside upon release,
if that information is available.
1027. (a) When a defendant pleads not guilty by reason of insanity
the court must select and appoint two, and may select and appoint three,
psychiatrists, or licensed psychologists who have a doctoral degree
in psychology and at least five years of postgraduate experience in
the diagnosis and treatment of emotional and mental disorders, to examine
the defendant and investigate his mental status. It is the duty of the
psychiatrists or psychologists so selected and appointed to make the
examination and investigation, and to testify, whenever summoned, in
any proceeding in which the sanity of the defendant is in question.
The psychiatrists or psychologists so appointed by the court shall be
allowed, in addition to their actual traveling expenses, such fees as
in the discretion of the court seems just and reasonable, having regard
to the services rendered by the witnesses. The fees allowed shall be
paid by the county where the indictment was found or in which the defendant
was held for trial.
(b) Any report on the examination and investigation made pursuant to
subdivision (a) shall include, but not be limited to, the psychological
history of the defendant, the facts surrounding the commission of the
acts forming the basis for the present charge used by the psychiatrist
or psychologist in making his examination of the defendant, and the
present psychological or psychiatric symptoms of the defendant, if any.
(c) This section does not presume that a psychiatrist or psychologist
can determine whether a defendant was sane or insane at the time of
the alleged offense. This section does not limit a court's discretion
to admit or exclude, pursuant to the Evidence Code, psychiatric or psychological
evidence about the defendant's state of mind or mental or emotional
condition at the time of the alleged offense.
(d) Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed or construed to
prevent any party to any criminal action from producing any other expert
evidence with respect to the mental status of the defendant; where expert
witnesses are called by the district attorney in such action, they shall
only be entitled to such witness fees as may be allowed by the court.
(e) Any psychiatrist or psychologist so appointed by the court may be
called by either party to the action or by the court itself and when
so called shall be subject to all legal objections as to competency
and bias and as to qualifications as an expert. When called by the court,
or by either party, to the action, the court may examine the psychiatrist,
or psychologist as deemed necessary, but either party shall have the
same right to object to the questions asked by the court and the evidence
adduced as though the psychiatrist or psychologist were a witness for
the adverse party.
When the psychiatrist or psychologist is called and examined by the
court the parties may cross-examine him in the order directed by the
court. When called by either party to the action the adverse party may
examine him the same as in the case of any other witness called by such
party.
|